Return to Curricula and Speaker Reviews
Printer Friendly Version
|
In the video “Sex Still Has a Price Tag,” Pam Stenzel, a self-described “world renown” abstinence educator, delivers two 40-plus-minute monologues to a studio audience of high school students. Walking an empty stage, Stenzel, who attended Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University, comes across as somewhere between a stand-up comic and a televangelist. She uses a preacher’s cadence and often yells at her audience in attempts to emphasize her points. Throughout her presentation, Stenzel lowers her voice to a meek whine in a series of unflattering parodies of former clients and students whom she refers to as “little girls.” To ensure that her audience is sufficiently aware of the consequences of sex, Stenzel focuses on unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and other negative outcomes of sex such as emotional pain and the inability to bond. Her presentation relies on fear, promotes shame, and mandates decisions for young people. Relying On Negative MessagesMessages of Fear—Portraying Premarital Sex as Harmful
The presentation hammers home the concept that “you will pay” for having sex by telling young people exactly what form this payment may take from unintended pregnancy, to STDs, to emotional heartbreak, to death. Ms. Stenzel’s tone throughout her presentation can best be described as punitive, as though she knows that some of the teens in this world (and some members of her audience) have had or will have sex outside of her parameters, and she wants them to know that they will be punished. In reality, however, the rules she presents are based not on laws but on a set of conservative social values that are not universally held and her “punishments” are exaggerations designed to scare young people rather than help them think critically about their actions.
Messages of Shame—Creating a Dichotomy between “Good” and “Bad” People
Stenzel presents sex with more than one partner as the ultimate litmus test of a person’s moral character and not-so-subtly suggests that young people who have had sex have failed this test. It is important to remember that 47% of high school students (and 63% of high school seniors) have had sexual intercourse.[1] It is irresponsible and potentially harmful to suggest that these young people lack character and integrity and are no longer “marriage” material.
Distorting Information
Sexually Transmitted Diseases—Misleading Students
Rather than focusing on how STDs are transmitted, how young people can avoid these diseases, or what they should do should they suspect they have one, Stenzel chooses to focus her presentation on the inevitable life-altering consequences of contracting an STD. And, rather than present testing as a responsible way to protect one’s future health, Stenzel discourages young people from being tested by treating it as a punishment and, worse, useless. STDs are a serious public health problem and young people, whether they chose to be sexually active or not, need unbiased information that this presentation refuses to provide.
Condoms and Contraception—Discouraging Use
Condoms were never intended to protect young people’s reputation or character, they were intended to prevent pregnancy and STDs and years of scientific research shows that they do this quite effectively. Stenzel’s offhanded comments about condoms are neither educational nor helpful as they provide no information but may very well discourage young people from using condoms when they do become sexually active. And, her suggestion that hormonal contraception increases risk for STDs has no basis in science and is clearly designed to scare young people rather than educate them.
Mandating Decisions
Specific Advice—Discouraging Critical Thinking
Throughout her highly biased presentation it becomes clear that Stenzel is merely paying lip service to teens as independent decision makers, and does not, in fact, view them as a capable of making their own choices. Stenzel begins her presentation by suggesting that she is not here to make decisions for the young people in the audience but wants them to be informed in order to make their own decisions. Young people would be better served by an educator who followed through on this idea and truly helped them think critically about sexuality.
Pregnancy Options—Mandating Choices
While Stenzel is well within her rights to share her own background with young people, the way in which she reveals it is nothing short of manipulative. By comparing herself to each audience member and referring to abortion as a personal “death penalty,” Stenzel practically dares her students to think otherwise. Her past may be painful and it is understandable that pregnancy options are a very personal topic for her, nonetheless this does not give her license to mandate choices for others. All women need to know that if they face an unintended pregnancy as a young person or an adult, they have options that are equally valid and available. It is not the place of an educational program to choose for them. [1]Danice K. Eaton, et al., “Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2005,” Surveillance Summaries, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 55.SS-5 (9 June 2006): 1-108, accessed 8 June 2006, <http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/yrbs/index.htm>.
[2] Chlamydia - CDC Fact Sheet, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (April 2006), accessed 19 September 2007, <http://www.cdc.gov/std/Chlamydia/STDFact-Chlamydia.htm>; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - CDC Fact Sheet, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (May 2004), accessed 19 September 2007, <http://www.cdc.gov/std/PID/STDFact-PID.htm>.
[3] 2000 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates?National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2002), accessed 20 September 2007, <http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ArchivedARTPDFs/ART2000part1.pdf>; 2004 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates?National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports (Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2006), accessed 20 September 2007, <http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2004/508PDF/2004ART_Intro-NationalSum_t508.pdf>.
[4] Common Questions About HPV and Cervical Cancer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (28 August 2007), accessed 20 September 2007, <http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/common-questions.htm>.
|
