| SIECUS CURRICULUM REVIEW SUMMARY Passion & Principles A Fear-Based Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Curriculum | ![]() |
Return to Knowing the Opposition Return to The Full Report
|
SUMMARY: SIECUS REVIEW OF Passion & Principles
Passion & Principles is a fear-based, abstinence-only-until-marriage curriculum. It contains almost no information on important topics such as puberty, anatomy, human reproduction, sexual orientation, and contraception. It includes a few scattered facts about Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs) and an appendix that provides a paragraph about each of several common STDs. Other than that, the program focuses exclusively on the inevitable consequences of premarital sex and the need for sexual purity. The information that is included is incomplete and often inaccurate and the entire curriculum relies on fear and shame and provides biased, and often religiously based, messages about marriage and pregnancy options. Ultimately, Passion & Principles falls far short of meeting the needs of young people. NOT APPROPRIATE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL Religious Undertones — Promoting specific religious beliefs
Although some of these statements were printed lightly or blacked out for the public school version there is no doubt that this curriculum remains patently religious in nature and is inappropriate for our society which was founded on the separation of church and state. RELYING ON NEGATIVE MESSAGES Messages of Fear and Shame— Trying to scare students and instill guilt.
This focus on consequences is clearly designed to scare students rather than educate them and the odd focus on pornography serves only to underscore the curriculum's messages of fear. According to recent studies, forty-seven percent of all high school students have had sexual intercourse. It is inappropriate and potentially harmful for education programs to imply that these teens lack self-control or self-respect or to suggest that they are less worthy of love, trust, and respect. This can only be damaging to these students and serve to alienate them from their peers and the program. Sexual Arousal —Describing sex as an uncontrollable force .
This is perhaps the most dangerous message teens can be given about sexual activity: in suggesting that teens have no control over their actions, it actually discourages them from making wise sexual decisions and taking responsibility for their actions. Young people need to know that at any point in a relationship, and at any point during sexual activity, they have the right and the ability to set their own sexual boundaries and that it is their responsibility to do so. DISTORING INFORMATION Sexually Transmitted Diseases— Misleading students.
These statements are inaccurate: AIDS is caused by HIV, and Chlamydia, which is spread through contact with infected secretions (vaginal, cervical, or semen), primarily infects the cervix or urethra in women and the urethra in men. In addition to these blatant inaccuracies, the curriculum fails to explain that many long-term consequences of STDs are preventable if the STD is caught and treated. Condoms— Emphasizing failure
In truth, even with typical use condoms only have a 14% failure rate (not 20%), and with consistent and correct use they are recognized to reduce transmission of Chlamydia and have been scientifically proven to effectively protect uninfected individuals with HIV-positive partners. The curriculum relies on fear in an apparent attempt to undermine young people's confidence in condoms. This approach seems to be based on the illogical assumption that if young people believe condoms will not work, they will abstain from sexual intercourse. While such inaccurate information may discourage teens from using condoms, this does not mean they will not have sex. Instead it means that they will be at increased risk for unintended pregnancy and STDs, including HIV, when they do become sexually active. PROMOTING BIASES The Marriage Mandate— Promoting one lifestyle
The curriculum explores marriage in a limited and directive way that presents it as the only appropriate way of life and suggests that individuals who choose otherwise are making the wrong decision for themselves and society. It is not the place of education programs to mandate choices for students. In addition, this focus on marriage ignores the needs of gay and lesbian students who can never legally marry in this country. Pregnancy Options— Mandating choices
It is important for educational programs, especially those for use in public schools, to respect the diversity of opinions and provide unbiased information on all options available to a woman confronting an unintended pregnancy as a teenager or an adult. Passion & Purity does not adhere to this standard of educational programming, instead it relies on an incomplete presentation and clearly biased language. |
copyright © 2005, SIECUS